HOLMAN FRED
STEPHENS
An
appreciation of his life and works
|
|

|
Holman
Fred Stephens died at the Lord Warden Hotel, Dover, on 23 October
1931 - 72 years ago; he was in his 63 rd year. During his lifetime
he built or was associated with some 16 light railways, ranging
from the diminutive Rye & Camber Tramway on the Sussex coast,
to the Bere Alston and Callington line, with its magnificent viaduct
of 12 arches, each of 60ft span and standing 120ft above the River
Tamar; a structure infinitely more graceful than Brunel's, but
to this day hardly known.
Stephens
was born into a family where art and literature predominated (his
father was F G Stephens, the Pre-Raphaelite artist and critic,
examples of whose work Stephens bequeathed to the Tate
Gallery) but his interest in railways was apparent at an early
age. Having studied civil engineering at University College under
Sir Alexander Kennedy, " Holly" Stephens was apprenticed
at the workshops of the Metropolitan Railway, Neasden, in 1881
before embarking on a career of light railway construction and
management that was to span a period of 40 years.
|
|
Stephens'
educational achievements were noteworthy rather than outstanding.
After matriculating in 1887, he studied engineering briefly at University
College London under the Professor of the faculty, Sir Alexander
Kennedy. In 1888 his father, Frederick Stephens, arranged with John
Bell, General Manager of the Metropolitan Railway, for him to enter
the Company's works at Neasden as a pupil of the Locomotive Superintendent,
John Hanbury. Hanbury was a distinguished engineer andhad served
his apprenticeship under Matthew Kirtley at the locomotive sheds
of the Midland Railway at Derby. In due course, Stephens pressed
for the opportunity of gaining experience in civils work and Hanbury
suggested that he approach Seaton, who was working for the Metropolitan
on extensive alterations to Baker street and Portland Road stations.
Stephens, who never hesitated to take advantage of family connections,
made play of his family's acquaintance with Sir Edward Watkin, Chairman
of both the South Eastern and Metropolitan Railways and this was
probably enough to persuade Seaton to take Stephens on. Edward P
Seaton, a consulting engineer with 20 years experience was responsible
for the design of the route and structures of the Cranbrook and
Paddock Wood Railway and Stephens was employed by him as his first
railway project. He was, at the relatively tender age of 22 still
a student, but many of the distinctive features and materials used
in the buildings on this line were adopted by him subsequently on
other schemes. He did, however, claim to have had the responsibility
of sole supervision of the works, including setting out the line
and was resident at Cranbrook throughout the construction period.
The Hawkhurst railway project was an ideal opportunity to gain practical
experience. The line was an offshoot of the South Eastern and one
of the few schemes directly involving a major established railway
company with which Stephens was to become involved.
The
Hawkhurst line was opened from Paddock Wood to Cranbrook on 1st
October 1892 and to Hawkhurst on 4th September 1893. After the line
was completed, Stephens stayed on for the customary maintenance
period and then returned to London with little prospect of any immediate
work. He carefully nurtured an acquaintanceship with Sir Myles Fenton,
General Manager of the South Eastern Railway, by sending him tickets
for Royal Academy exhibitions and gifts of engravings, supplied
by his father. He claimed that Sir Myles had virtually promised
that if the proposed extension of the Hawkhurst line to Appledore
were to go ahead, he would be given the job of supervising the works,
but this line was not to be. In May 1894, Seaton proposed Stephens'
application for associate membership of The Institution of Civil
Engineers. Other distinguished members who put their names to the
application included his old tutor Sir Alexander Kennedy, W. Wainwright
and James Stirling. From then on Stephens was suitably qualified
to undertake projects in his own right.
Stephens
was essentially an individualist, who set out to build and operate
railways of economical construction in circumstances where the establishment
would have felt that the odds were heavily weighted against success.
His philosophy was clear and decisive; "it is absolutely essential
to have a policy and stick to it", he wrote to his parents
in 1891, "if it fails try some other way, I am sure that this
is the only way to get on". Whilst at Cranbrook Stephens built
up a friendship built up with Edward Peterson, the son of the Rector
of Biddenden, the Rev William Peterson and a solicitor with a practice
in Staplehurst. Peterson formed a company called the Light
Railways Syndicate in July 1895 for the purpose of financing
bills or orders in Parliament for proposed new railways. The intention
was that once the necessary authorisations had been obtained, a
separate company would be formed for each scheme to raise the capital
and the syndicate would receive a fee for its services. A total
of seven schemes were formally proposed by the Light Railways Syndicate
and its sister company, the Economic Railways Company, formed in
1898, but only one, the Sheppey Light Railway, was built. In all
cases, Stephens was to have been the engineer and had a smallish
shareholding in the syndicate.
|
 |
The
failures Stephens had in the early years were balanced by many successes,
commencing with the Selsey line in 1895 and the Rother Valley (later
the Kent & East Sussex) in 1900 - the first line to be constructed
under the provisions of the 1896 Light Railways Act. Thereafter
a whole string of schemes came to fruition - the Sheppey Light,
Bere Alston & Callington, Shropshire & Montgomeryshire,
Burry Port, to mention but a few.
In
1918 Stephens prepared a full C.V. which
showed the great extent of his interests and achievements.
After
the Great War, Stephens remained active in railway development where
others would have found the environment impossible. The North Devon
& Cornwall Junction Light, for instance, constructed in the
early 1920s against fearsome odds, both practical and financial.
Indeed, if any criticism can be directed against Stephens, it is
that he failed to anticipate the arrival of the motor bus and its
impact on rural travel.
|
| Nevertheless,
he saved the famous Festiniog Railway from bankruptcy in the 1920s
and had the Kent coal fields achieved their expected potential they
would have been amply served by a network of lines engineered and
managed by him. His biggest disappointment was the Southern Heights,
a projected electric line in Surrey on which he was working almost
up to the time of his death and which failed to come to fruition,
largely as a result of the negative attitude of the Local Authorities.
|
 |
In
private life Stephens was an enigmatic, even an eccentric character.
A tall, striking figure, instantly recognisable, with a military
bearing; an arrogant man, but with immense personal charm and wit,
much admired and liked by his staff; his attitude to women always
courteous, sometimes supercilious - occasionally mysterious, he
nevertheless had few friends outside his business acquaintances
and lived a solitary existence mainly in hotels or at his clubs.
A lifelong bachelor with no close relatives, he had few interests
apart from his railways; his army service was spasmodic, but he attained
the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in 1916, mainly in respect of services
to the Territorial Force, a contact that he maintained throughout
most of the 1920s. His interest in classical mythology, if somewhat
superficial, is evidenced by the naming of many of his locomotives
after goddesses.
When Stephens
died his funeral was
held at St. Peter's Hammersmith. Internment was however in the family
grave at Brompton Cemetery. Stephens name was inscribed on the side
of the Tombstone -his parents name is on the front.
|
| Stephens
was a man of his time; had he survived the 1930s he would have seen
his empire of light railways crumble as surely as they did without
him. Ironically, it is the revival of the Kent & East Sussex,
the Festiniog and other minor lines around the country in the motorway
era that has created renewed interest in Stephens'life and work. True,
these railways fulfil a very different role to the one he envisaged,
but railway preservationists today have something very much in common
with Stephens - a tenacity and dedication of purpose that is surely
as relevant today as it was 75 years ago. |
 |
Overshadowed
by the charisma of the mighty Colonel, little has been written about
Austen himself. When he succeeded to the top job in 1931, Austen was,
by all accounts, a hard working and versatile manager, but he undoubtedly
lacked the pragmatism and innovation of Stephens and never attracted
the awe and affection of his staff for which the Colonel is remembered.
Stephens' relationship with Austen was certainly one of mutual respect,
paternalistic, perhaps bordering on friendship; gifts were exchanged
between the two men and Stephens acted as godfather to Austen's only
son who also bore his name. But Stephens never socialised with Austen
in the way that he did with, say, Gilbert Szlumper of the Southern
Railway and other influential members of his London clubs, probably
because of Austen's humble origins. |
|
Communications
between the two men were more akin to master and servant over a
period of forty years, evidenced by surviving correspondence. Referring
to Austen in connection with a visit to his parents at their riverside
home in Hammersmith in August 1895, Stephens wrote, "Can you let
me man have the servant's room?", and on Boat Race day in March
1897, "May I bring my man with me? He has never seen the race and
would appreciate it I think".However, by the 1920s attitudes had
softened and Stephens wrote, "Dear WHA" in memos when Austen was
away on site visits.
After
Stephens untimely death in 1931 and against the background of mounting
recession, Austen dropped all ideas of expansion. This was in stark
contrast to the late 1920s when Stephens was still forging ahead
with plans for new lines including extensions to the East Kent Railway
and a completely new electric light railway, the Southern Heights,
designed to serve new suburban housing estates near Croydon. After
Stephens protracted illnesses culminating in his death, Austen finally
bowed to the inevitable and abandoned them.
|
 |
Stephens
did not have a hierarchy of titles at the Salford Terrace Office, the business was
much too personal for that but he referred to Austen verbally as
his "outdoor assistant". In practice, this meant acting as resident
engineer in the days of building new lines and general trouble-shooter
in the latter days of management by memo and make-do and mend.
The
Salford Terrace offices finally closed on 7 June 1948 after the
Kent & East Sussex, the East Kent and the Shropshire & Montgomeryshire
railways were nationalised and much of the general consultancy practice
lost. Austen, then aged 70, retired.
|
|
William
Henry Austen was born at Snodland in Kent on 8 May 1878. His father
was a labourer at the nearby Aylesford paper mill. William was however
largely raised by his grandmother at Cranbrook. When William left
school in 1891 he was apprenticed to Messrs Joseph T Firbank, the
contractors then engaged in the construction of the Cranbrook &
Paddock Wood railway. It is almost certain that here he first came
into contact with Stephens who at the age of 22, was working as
resident engineer on the line. By 1894 work was coming to an end
and Stephens obtained a brief to design and supervise the construction
of the Rye & Camber tramway. Austen joined him where he was
"put in charge of the locomotive workshops" and to all intents and
purposes was employed by Stephens as his assistant from this time.
After
Stephens' death Austen moved to ensure the continuity of the railways
notably by purchasing 23 Salford Terrace. His key operational appointment
was of managing director of the Kent & East Sussex in November
1931 becoming receiver and manager on 22 April 1932 at the behest
of the Southern Railway, the principal debenture holder. He became
general manager of the East Kent in 1932 and was appointed director
of the Shropshire Railways Company in the same year. Both the Weston,
Clevedon and Portishead, and the West Sussex lines were already
in receivership and Austen was appointed general manager for the
former, and engineer of the latter. He became consulting engineer
to the Ashover and Rye & Camber lines in succession to Stephens
and director of the North Devon & Cornwall Junction, which had
been worked by the Southern Railway since its inception in 1925.
Austen was also director of a curious outpost of the empire, the
Snailbeach District Railways which Stephens had acquired in 1923.
Austen's
involvement with the Festiniog and Welsh Highland Railways was no
less stormy than that experienced by his predecessor. Stephens had
been chairman and managing director since 1925 and his bombastic
style of management was not popular with the workforce. Austen became
engineer and locomotive superintendent but was not offered a board
appointment and the Tonbridge influence gradually diminished. In
1936 cuts in essetial maintenance by the Festiniog chairman were
the last straw for Austen and he tendered his resignation saying
that the decision showed "no consideration for tomorrow" .
Austen
married twice and had a son by his first wife, Holly, who preserved
many of the relics we now hold in the museum. Austen died at home
on 26 February 1956. Looking back on his career, he certainly provided
the continuity that was needed following Stephens' death, a task
which he did more than adequately, despite having no formal qualifications.
The question of succession never really arose in Austen's mind as
he had long maintained that the days of independent railways were
over and that nationalisation was inevitable.
Text:
Philip Shaw, [K&ESR Historian]
|

|