|
A Nasty
Accident
Mouse
over images for description or click on to see the larger pictures
Nasty accidents
on level crossings have been rather too prominent in the news of late
but are nothing new. Stephens was almost obsessive in his drive to
build light railways at minimal cost and one of his cherished economies
was gateless level crossings protected by cattle grids, (a system that
he may have pioneered in the UK so far as public roads were concerned).
This was adequate in days when little traffic was to be found on rural
roads and even then only a plodding horse cart or lorry. In 1914 however
progress in the shape of a speeding motor car nearly undid this neat
economy and could have cost the Kent and East Sussex Railway dear.
On a clear
April day the first morning train to Headcorn was unusually hauled
by that rarely used beast the 0-8-0T No 4 Hecate. The train itself
was the normal ex-South Western Railway three coach Set comprising
No. 1, 4 wheeled 3rd class Brake Comp., No. 2, 6 wheeled 1st and 3rd
class Comp. and No. 19, 4 wheeled 3rd class Brake Comp. With such super
power on the front and no wagons tied on behind the train was running
to time. Driver Edward Brazier and Fireman William Meggett slowed to
a crawl for the level crossing approaching Biddenden station and reportedly
whistled the usual warnings. Two thirds of the way across the road
they struck a motor car that, in today’s terminology ‘ had
come out of nowhere’. Swerving across the road to try and avoid
the oncoming train, the car collided with the leading buffer of the
engine and was swung round and dragged some 40’ over the Cattle
Guards and along the Permanent Way towards the Station before the Train
was brought to a standstill.
Palmer, the Biddenden station agent, immediately reported this to Stephens,
in the following matter of fact terms.
I
beg to report that the 9.11am train here this morning collided with
a Motor Car on the Level Crossing at Biddenden Station. The Motor
Car when I first saw it, was travelling at a fast speed, and
on the Engine Driver whistling again just by the signal, the car seemed
to swerve across the road towards our fence, and then come gradually
to a standstill, with the two front wheels over one of our metals,
and the Driver looking Halden way. The car seemed to be still
about
a second before the engine buffer hit the bonnet, turning the
car round and hitting the body up against the fence, which fell to
pieces,
and appeared to pitch 3 men out – one man was dragged about
20 yards by the Motor which was caught on the guard which is
fixed to the front of the Engine.
I rendered
every assistance and procured a Doctor at once from the Village, who
said he must have assistance, also a car, so I telephoned to Tenterden
Agent to fetch Dr. Skinner and a motor from Simmonson’s to take
the injured to Maidstone Hospital.
The car
belonged to Marchant & Tubb, Outfitters, Maidstone. The occupants
were – Geo. Bowles, Driver, Lewis Matson, Herbert John Bowers
and Clarence R Cole.
The injuries
were as follows:
Geo. Bowles
- Fractured skull and was delirious.
Lewis Matson – Scalp
wound & back injured.
Herbert
John Bowers – Face and knee slightly injured.
(Allowed to go home from hospital)
Clarence
R Cole – Nose scratched and hand.
(This man did not go to Maidstone Hospital)
The Driver
of our train was Brazier, Guard, J. Stanford, Engine No. 4 (“Hecate”).
I have names
of witnesses – Mr Tuscon, Bishopsdale Farm, Biddenden, Gun, Guy
House, Biddenden – Capt. Hall, Birchley, Biddenden, Pinnock,
Wagstaffe, Biddenden, H. Seagrave, National Sanatorium, Biddenden.
I also beg
to state I judge the speed of our train at 3 to 4 miles per hour when
the accident happened.
(Signed)
C. Palmer
W H Austin was immediately despatched, probably from Tonbridge and
the next day reported
As per your
instructions I visited the scene of the above yesterday arriving on
the spot about 12-25pm (note the speed of his arrival-ed.) and beg
to report as follows:
“In
this case it appears that the 8-55am train ex Tenterden to Headcorn
whilst crossing the Public Road Level Crossing on approaching Biddenden
Station at 9-13am was run into by a “Ford” Commercial Motor
Car, Registered No D.8318, the property of Messrs Marchant & Tubbs,
Ltd. Maidstone. The Car (which was completely wrecked) contained four
occupants…there follows details of car occupants and train
he continues…
“From
evidence received it appears that this Car was travelling in the direction
of Tenterden and from a statement made by the Biddenden Station Agent,
Palmer, who witnessed the accident was going at a fair speed. Palmer
states that the Chauffeur of the Car was seated on the right hand side
of the Car and another occupant was seated immediately on the left
of the Chauffeur their attention being directed towards the Station
(the opposite direction in which the train was proceeding) and as the
Car was crossing over the Level Crossing collided with the left trailing
buffer of the engine the Car being swung round and dragged some 40’ over
the Cattle Guards and along the Permanent Way towards the Station before
the Train was brought to a standstill.”
“I
have interviewed Driver Brazier who states that he was proceeding across
the Public Road at a speed of 6 miles per hour. Previous to this the
warning whistle was given at the speed Board, and again immediately
before crossing the road. A good lookout was kept before crossing the
road by both Himself and the Fireman but nothing was noticed to be
coming along the road previous to crossing and it was not until the
engine was two-thirds of the way across the road when the collision
occurred. Guard Stanford and Station Agent Palmer bear out Braziers
statement.”
“I
would mention that a Mr Gurr of Biddenden volunteered information to
me yesterday as to passing this Car some ¾ miles from the Station.
He states that he was engaged with his man carting stone from the Station
when this Car passed him and he commented on the speed of same (which
was estimated at 40 miles per hour) to his man and remarked that the
occupants would come to grief sooner or later going at such a speed.”
“The
Station Agent has names of other witnesses who would tender evidence
if required as to what they saw.”
(Signed)
W. H. Austen.
This
accident, mild as it was by today’s standards, caused a stir. Not least
because the car’s occupants, although clearly speeding by the
standards of the day round a shallow blind bend on the approach to
a built up area decided to sue the railway in much the same vein as
today’s coffin chasing lawyers. Worst of all they won the first
round for when the case came up at Cranbrook County Court following
conflicting evidence about the adequacy of the whistled warnings, a
number of questions were put to the jury who, in the words of The Railway
Gazette ‘ evidently intended to find everything they could against
the company’. Two questions caused such concern that they were
subject of correspondence at Ministerial level because of the cost
implications for building light Railways. Amendments to the Light Railway
Acts were even considered .The Questions were
‘Was
it negligence on the part of the railway company not to have gates’;
and
‘ Was it negligence on the part of the Railway Company not to have watchmen.’
The answer
to both was ‘yes’
Within weeks
the Appeal Court supported the verdict. The senior Justice cut short
the proceedings saying the appeal judges quite clearly felt that it
was impossible to find any evidence not to support the finding of the
Cranbrook jury. Leave to Appeal was refused but Stephens battled on
and fortunately for the financial well being of his railways finally
secured a favourable judgement. Writing in victorious mood to the responsible
senior official in Whitehall he wrote
‘ We
were successful off our own bat. I think however that if we had had
the Board of Trade’s assistance, we should probably have secured
the ‘execution’ of the plaintiffs!’
Seriously
and practically the case showed the importance of the railways duty
to do everything necessary to show the exercise of reasonable care
in the conduct of its business.
Perhaps
we might finally note the Kent and East Sussex Railway subsequently
became noteworthy for copious and noisy whistling at all of its level
crossings!
|