|

By
the 1930s the Hundred of Manhood & Selsey Tramway was on its last
legs. In 1934 the Southern Railway become interested in the possibility
of taking over and commissioned a report by Edwin Cox, their Traffic
Manager. In the event the Southern did not proceed and the line
closed in 1935. Stephen Garrett has edited the report, which provides
a fascinating insight into the history of the Tramway and its operation.
MEMORANDUM:
E. C. Cox, Esq. C. B. E., M. V. O.
THE
HUNDRED OF MANHOOD AND SELSEY
TRAMWAYS
COMPANY LIMITED
History
and Legal Status
The
Hundred of Manhood and Selsey Tramways Company was registered as
a limited liability company in 1896 with a nominal share capital
of £12,000; it was promoted largely by local interests and the first
subscribers thereto, with the exception of Colonel Stephens the
Engineer, were all residents in Sussex.
It
is understood that the Lewes firm of Estate Agents, Messrs. Powell
& Company, secured the land for the line between Chichester and
Selsey by private treaty and also negotiated the crossing of the
public highway at several places with the County Council.
Although
there is a provision in the memorandum of Association of the Company
to the effect that authority is given "To apply for, promote and
obtain any Act of Parliament, Provisional Order or Licence of the
Board of Trade or other Authority for enabling the Company to carry
any of its objects into effect," there is no knowledge that any
such authority has ever been obtained by the Hundred of Manhood
and Selsey Tramways Company Limited, and apparently operations commenced
in 1897 without any legal status and have continued to the present
time except in so far as they may be covered by the West Sussex
Railway Certificate, referred to below.
In
1899 an increase in share capital from £12,000 to £16,800 was authorised
but of this amount £2,400 remains unissued. At the commencement
Debentures at 4% amounting to £7,000 were issued and a mortgage
of £1,000 was obtained on certain property at Selsey. Between 1911
and 1924 a further £5,000 of Debentures were issued at 5% and owing
to the impossibility of redemption those previously issued in due
course were raised to 5½%.
In
due course Colonel Stephens became the Chairman of the Limited Liability
Company and steps were apparently taken to give the Tramway some
legal status. With this in view a certificate under the Railway
Construction Facilities Act 1864 was secured from the Ministry of
Transport, the order being known as the West Sussex Railway Certificate
1924 (Statutory Rule and Order 1924 No.935). This Certificate authorised
inter alia the following powers:-
a)
The incorporation of a Statutory Company known as the West Sussex
Railway Company of which Lt.Col.Stephens, Messrs Henry Bates and
Luther Clayton, were to be the first directors.
b)
The construction of a railway on the lines of the Selsey Tramways
between Chichester and Selsey.
c)
The purchase by the West Sussex Company of the existing undertakings
by the Tramway Company, together with any debts and liabilities.
Under
this order regulations were made regarding the crossing of the public
roads at various places and the maximum axle load and speed. It
further empowered the West Sussex Railway Company to enter into
agreement with the Southern Railway with regard to the re-construction,
working and management of the line. On and after the appointed date
the charges to be made by the West Sussex Company were to be determined
by the Railway Rates Tribunal.
At
an extraordinary General Meeting of the Hundred of Manhood and Selsey
Tramways Company Limited held on the 17th December 1923, the order
which was not made by the Ministry until 15th July 1924, was approved,
and the directors of the Tramway Company were empowered to make
such arrangements for carrying out the powers granted by the certificate
as they thought fit. This resolution was confirmed at a further
Extraordinary General Meeting held on the 2nd January 1924.
On
the 10th October 1928 the West Sussex Railway Company entered into
an agreement with the Hundred of Manhood and Selsey Tramways Company
Limited to take over, reconstruct and maintain its undertaking and
to pay the debenture interest and other interest for which the Tramway
is liable as and when demanded, or make other arrangements for the
exchange of debentures. The West Sussex Railway Company also undertook,
if requested, to exchange shares in the Tramway Company for shares
in the Railway Company, and also take over all the debts and liabilities
of the Tramway Company.
In
the returns rendered by the Tramway Company to the Registrar at
Somerset House an item "Light Railway Order-£181.8.3" appeared as
an asset and in successive years this item was increased until it
stood at £453.9.4 in 1925. It is understood that the amount refers
to expenditure incurred in connection with proposed extension to
Patcham and Bognor and also Wittering, but the Order was never issued.
It appears that the expenditure in obtaining the West Sussex Certificate,
which is not a Light Railway Order, was borne by Col. Stephens out
of his private resources.
Though
the nominal capital of the West Sussex Railway Company under this
certificate was £45,000, only £150 has ever been issued, and this
is held equally by Mr Austen, Mr Luther Clayton and the executors
of Mr Macveagh. The provisions of the agreement of 1928 have never
been carried out, and according to Section 22 of the Railway Construction
Facilities Act 1864 the certificate expired except as to so much
of the railway as was then completed, 5 years after the date of
commencement. Although, of course, the matter is one for the Solicitor
to decide, it does appear that there arises a strong presumption
that the Tramway Company is operating without any status whatsoever.
The decision of the Railway Rates Tribunal (S.R. & O. 1929 No.148)
referred to later is, however, somewhat at variance with this view.
|
Topography
|
|
| |
The
principal features of the line, including all public road crossings,
are set out hereunder, with the approximate distance from Chichester
shewn at the left. |
| |
M.
C. |
Chichester.
The Selsey tram station is situated to the south of the Southern
Railway coal yard. It consists of the passenger station with
run-round facilities and also a goods siding. There is a connection
to the Southern Railway, and other sidings serving Messrs. Sadlers
and certain oil companies tenancies (see Section 7). From Chichester
the line curves sharply in a southerly direction (radius 6 chains)
and crosses an occupation road leading to Messrs. Sadlers. |
| |
|
|
| |
0
40 |
Stockbridge
Road Crossing. This is a public road carrying appreciable traffic.
From this point the line runs in a direction parallel to the
City of Chichester Canal, until it crosses it at the drawbridge. |
| |
|
|
| |
1
51 |
Canal
Drawbridge. The Canal, which is the property of the City, has
ceased to be used for commercial purposes. At a point further
down the Canal the County Council have recently abolished a
road bridge and substituted therefor an embankment with culverts
for the water; there seems no reason why this course should
not be followed with the Tramway. |
| |
|
|
| |
2
6 |
Hunston.
The main public road from Chichester to Selsey is crossed here,
and on the south of the crossing there is a station and siding.
The station is at the south end of the village. |
| |
|
|
| |
2
65 |
Hoe
Farm Private Halt and Siding. These were provided as part considerations
in the conveyance of land for the tramway. |
| |
|
|
| |
3
50 |
Chalder
Station and Siding. The village of Sidlesham is really in two
parts, and Chalder Station, which is named after an adjacent
farm, serves the north part of the village. This station is
within 1/4 mile of the Sidlesham Church and about 1/3 mile
from the main road from which access to the station is obtained
by the private farm road, the user being covered by an agreement
the Tramway Company paying £2 per annum. |
| |
|
|
| |
3
70 |
Church
Farm Private Siding. Provided when the line was built. |
| |
|
|
| |
4
30 |
Mill
Pond Halt and Public Road Crossing. |
| |
|
|
| |
4
75 |
Sidlesham.
Station, siding, crossing place and public road crossing. The
station is in a good position to serve the south part of the
village. Between Sidlesham and Ferry the line skirts Pagham
Harbour, being carried on an embankment constructed after the
sea breach in 1910. |
| |
|
|
| |
5
54 |
Ferry.
Halt, siding and public road crossing over main Chichester-Selsey
road. |
| |
|
|
| |
6
53 |
Golf
Club Halt. |
| |
|
|
| |
7
7 |
Selsey
Bridge. The main Selsey road crosses the line by means of an
overbridge. There is here a halt, the ballast pit of the Company
and a private siding serving the Trojan Brick Works. |
| |
|
|
| |
7
27 |
Selsey Town Station. This is situated about 1/2 mile from the
centre of the town, 1/2 mile from the East Beach and fully 1
mile from the West Beach. The Loco Depot is here, and the yard
holds approximately 50 wagons. |
| |
|
|
| |
7
40 |
End
of Line. The line originally proceeded for another 1/2 mile
in an easterly direction to Selsey Beach Station but about 1912
the line between Selsey and Selsey Beach ceased to be worked
and the land was sold. |
| |
|
|
The
country for the most part is flat, in no place rising above the
50ft. contour. Unfortunately the line had to be constructed to conform
with the strips that had been acquired by private treaty and possibly
the best layout for a railway from Chichester to Selsey was not
obtained. However, the sharpest curve is that leading from Chichester
Station and is of 6 chains radius, and apart from this there is
nothing under 10 chains radius. No gradient profile of the line
exists but it is understood that the steepest gradient occurs for
a short distance of 1 in 50 in both directions south of Hoe Farm.
EQUIPMENT.
Way
and Works. The line was originally laid with flat bottom rails
weighing 42 lbs. to the yard; many of these remain in use and it
is doubtful if weighed today whether they would go to 36 lbs. to
the yard. The standard of maintenance is poor. Mr Austen has given
notice that he can accept no vehicle with an axle load exceeding
10 tons on the line. No fixed signals are provided and the whole
of the points are hand worked on the ground without facing point
bolts in the running line. Presumably if the West Sussex certificate
were in force and the line inspected by the Ministry - which it
never has been - this requirement would have to be met.
Cattle
guards are provided at the public road crossings, but many of the
accommodation gates are in disrepair. The fencing is extant, but
needs strengthening.
The
station buildings are of corrugated iron and the platform faces
in concrete. The halts are elementary timber structures.
Rolling
Stock. The Company's rolling stock appears to have little value
beyond scrap judged by S.R. standards and brief particulars are
set out hereunder. It should be specially noted that the stock marked
thus * does not belong to the Tramway Company but to the executors
of Col. Stephens. It is on loan, but no recompense is received.
At the present time the locomotive and rail cars are working the
traffic and if withdrawn the line could not carry on without further
acquisitions.
| (i) |
Locomotives |
|
|
|
| |
Name |
Type
|
Approx.
Date |
Remarks |
| |
Selsey |
2-4-2
T |
1897 |
Beyond
repair |
| |
Maraus
(?) |
0-6-0
T |
1883 |
|
| |
Ringing
Rock |
0-6-0
T |
1883 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| (ii) |
(Rail
Motors (Converted 'Bus Chassis and Body type). |
| |
(a)
Ford Twin |
|
|
In
poor condition |
| |
(b)
Shefflex Twin * |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| (iii) |
Carriages |
|
|
|
| |
No. |
Type |
|
Remarks |
| |
4 |
Bogie
tram (original) |
|
Hopeless
condition |
| |
3 |
4-wheeled |
|
Hopeless
condition |
| |
3
* |
4-wheeled |
|
Bad
condition |
| |
2 |
6-wheeled
|
|
Recently
purchased from S.R. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| (iv) |
Wagons |
|
|
|
| |
4
Open and 4 covered |
|
|
| |
1
Special truck for Shefflex unit.* |
|
|
TERRITORY
| |
|
|
| |
The
census particulars
in respect of the three places served are set out in the table
hereunder :- |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Civil Parish |
Population
|
Population
|
Structurally
separate
dwellings occupied.
|
| |
1921
|
1931
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Hunston |
307
|
359
|
95
|
|
| |
Sidlesham |
801
|
878
|
240
|
|
| |
Selsey |
2307
|
2514
|
677
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The
increase was, however, larger than might be thought from the figures
as the 1921 census was taken in June and included certain people
on holiday, whereas the 1931 census was taken in April.
The
country between Chichester and Selsey is for the most part pastoral
in character, though beet sugar is grown.
In
addition to the agricultural population at Hunston and Sidlesham,
there are certain residents of the artisan classes who work either
in Chichester or on certain building developments at Selsey.
In
view of its position Selsey is isolated to a great extent to the
east and west, and the main road from Chichester runs right to the
coast at Selsey, serving en route the villages of Hunston and Sidlesham.
Selsey itself has many attractions as a holiday resort; the sands
are very good and well suited for bathing, and boating, fishing
and golf are available. Up to the present the best class of development
has taken place on the West Beach which, as previously explained,
is farthest from the Selsey Tram Station. Schemes have been considered
from time to time to divert the line so as to adequately serve the
West Beach. On the East Side, however, development is now proceeding.
Adjacent to the station Mr W. Hobbs of Sutton is opening an estate
of small houses and, in addition, Messrs. Selsey Estates Ltd. And
Messrs. Duncan Gray and Partners are offering land for sale.
A holiday
camp consisting of brick buildings to house 300 people is being
erected on the Bill at Selsey.
The
occupants of the property on the West Beach appear mostly those
of the classes owning private cars, but the development on the east
side appears to cater for a less wealthy clientele. It therefore
seems that the station as at present positioned will be suitable
for serving that part of Selsey to which most traffic will go.
The
lobster pot fishery at Selsey is not unimportant and most of the
traffic emanating therefrom is at present conveyed by rail.
It
must not be overlooked that Selsey is the nearest seaside town to
Chichester which has a population of 13,912 and beside being a cathedral
city has certain industrial activities, including a sausage and
potted meat factory of Messrs. Shippams, a tannery and dye works,
and an ice and cold storage works. Moreover, the huge population
of 249,000 centred at Portsmouth is only 23 miles away from Selsey
by rail.
There
has been some discussion respecting the erection of a sugar beet
factory adjacent to the Selsey tramway near the Stocksbridge Road
Crossing at Donnington.
WORKING.
The
crossings of the various public roads are only provided with cattle
guards and the usual notices but according to Section 17 of the
West Sussex Certificate the Ministry of Transport at any time after
the completion of the railway may require the Company to erect and
maintain gates across the railway at each side of the road. The
Certificate further provides that the speed of trains within a distance
of 200 yards from a level crossing over a public road without gates
shall not exceed 10 miles per hour. About 1932 an accident occurred
at the Stocksbridge Road Level Crossing and the scene was visited
by one of the Ministry's Inspecting Officers. The City of Chichester
proposed that colour light signals should be provided and actually
an estimate was obtained from Messrs. Tyers & Co. Ltd. Shewing how
such signals could be provided at a cost of £39.10.0. In view, however,
of the financial position of the railway this course could not be
followed and ultimately it was agreed that trains should actually
come to a stand before crossing the road. This additional provision
as well as applying in both directions at Stocksbridge Road also
applies in one direction at Hunston and in both directions at Ferry.
Apart from certain other restrictions with regard to speeds on gradients
and curves the Certificate provides that otherwise the speed shall
not exceed at any time 25 miles per hour.
The
line is nominally worked by staff and ticket, the crossing place
being at Sidlesham, the automatic brake is not employed and the
mixed trains work without any goods brake van at the end, in fact,
it appears that the line does not possess such a vehicle.
The
present timetable is as shewn hereunder together with the connections
from and to London. The whole of the service is worked by rail motors
with the exception of the trip marked "Mixed" :-
|
WEEKDAYS
|
| |
DOWN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
a.m. |
a.m. |
a.m. |
p.m. |
p.m. |
p.m. |
p.m. |
| |
London |
dep. |
6.28
|
8.46
|
11.20
|
1.40
|
4.20
|
6.
0 |
7.20 |
| |
|
|
|
|
S.O. |
|
|
|
|
| |
Chichester |
arr. |
8.54
|
10.46
|
1.22
|
3.48
|
6.19
|
8.13
|
9.40 |
| |
|
|
|
Mixed |
|
|
|
S.O. |
W.O. |
| |
Chichester |
dep. |
9.15 |
11.30 |
2.10 |
4.10 |
6.30 |
8.30 |
10.30 |
| |
Hunston |
arr. |
9.24
|
11.40
|
2.19
|
4.19
|
6.39
|
8.39
|
10.39 |
| |
Chalder |
" |
9.29
|
11.46 |
2.24 |
4.24 |
6.44 |
8.44 |
10.44 |
| |
Mill
Pond Halt |
" |
9.32 |
11.49 |
2.27 |
4.27 |
6.47 |
8.47 |
10.47 |
| |
Sidlesham |
" |
9.34 |
11.55 |
2.29 |
4.29 |
6.49 |
8.49 |
10.49 |
| |
Ferry |
" |
9.39 |
12.
1 |
2.34 |
4.34 |
6.54 |
8.54 |
10.54 |
| |
Selsey
Bridge |
" |
9.44 |
12.10 |
2.39 |
4.39 |
6.59 |
8.59 |
10.59 |
| |
Selsey
Town |
" |
9.45 |
12.12 |
2.40 |
4.40 |
7.
0 |
9.
0 |
11.
0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
UP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Mixed |
|
|
|
Wed
& Sat. only |
|
| |
|
|
a.m. |
a.m. |
p.m. |
p.m. |
p.m. |
p.m. |
|
| |
Selsey
Town |
dep. |
8.10 |
10.
0 |
1.10 |
2.50 |
5.30 |
7.15 |
|
| |
Selsey
Bridge |
" |
8.11 |
10.
2 |
1.11 |
2.51 |
5.31 |
7.16 |
|
| |
Ferry |
" |
8.16 |
10.
8 |
1.16 |
2.56 |
5.36 |
7.21 |
|
| |
Sidlesham |
" |
8.21 |
10.13 |
1.21 |
3.
1 |
5.41 |
7.26 |
|
| |
Mill
Pond Halt |
" |
8.23 |
10.15 |
1.23 |
3.
3 |
5.43 |
7.28 |
|
| |
Chalder
|
" |
8.26 |
10.18 |
1.26 |
3.
6 |
5.46 |
7.31 |
|
| |
Hunston |
" |
8.31 |
10.27 |
1.31 |
3.11 |
5.51 |
7.36 |
|
| |
Chichester |
arr. |
8.40 |
10.40 |
1.40 |
3.20 |
6.
0 |
7.45 |
|
| |
Chichester |
dep. |
9.
6 |
11.15 |
1.55 |
3.29 |
6.24 |
8.
6 |
|
| |
London |
arr. |
10.55 |
1.17 |
4.14 |
5.33 |
8.25 |
10.25 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It
will be observed that the connections with London are in a number
of cases not satisfactory and the general goods traffic does not
reach Selsey until the mixed trip arrives at 12.12 p.m. There is
no Sunday service although this was tried a few years ago but the
receipts did not meet the expense.
The
average speed of the rail motor services is 14.7 miles per hour,
whilst the mixed train travels at an average speed of 10 miles per
hour. Despite these low average speeds the trains are not infrequently
late.
In
Summer the service is increased to 7 trains each way each weekday
and one additional train on Wednesdays and Saturdays only, the total
train mileage run in 1933 being as under :-
| |
Steam
trains |
5,410 |
|
| Motor
trains |
20,861 |
| Total
|
26,271 |
If
an up-to-date rail car were provided with good acceleration and
braking power it might be possible, whilst observing present restrictions,
to perform the journey between Chichester and Selsey, calling at
the stations but not the halts, in 23 minutes. Although this estimate
is on a mathematical basis it has not been submitted to the Locomotive
Department. It therefore appears that it might be possible to run
an hourly service over the line with such adjustments as are necessary
to make connections with services at Chichester.
If
colour light signals were provided at the public road crossings
and the track put into a good state of repair, there is some reason
for believing that the Ministry would sanction a speed of 40 miles
per hour with a restriction of 10 miles an hour over the public
road crossings.
The
traffic in Summer tends to be heavy on those trips connecting with
the principal London services and a fair quantity of accompanied
luggage is conveyed, the special truck in the Shefflex unit sometimes
being full to capacity. The following figures are extracted from
the records for two Saturdays in August last year :-
|
TRAIN
EX CHICHESTER |
|
TRAIN
EX SELSEY |
| |
|
No.
of passengers |
|
|
No.
of passengers |
| |
Time |
|
Time |
| |
|
5th |
12th |
|
|
5th |
12th |
| |
9.15 |
7 |
5 |
|
8.10 |
11 |
2 |
| |
11.
5 |
53 |
31 |
|
10.
0 |
8 |
18 |
| |
11.40 |
24 |
Nil |
|
11.15 |
5 |
4 |
| |
2.10 |
48 |
44 |
|
1.10 |
34 |
63 |
| |
4.10 |
28 |
26 |
|
2.50 |
21 |
29 |
| |
6.45 |
25 |
24 |
|
5.35 |
20 |
33 |
| |
7.45 |
5 |
9 |
|
7. 0 |
8 |
5 |
| |
10.30 |
4 |
4 |
|
9.45 |
- |
2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It
should be pointed out that on these particular days three trips
each way were worked by steam engine and there may be some difficulties
at peak times if a Sentinel Rail Car were employed seating 44 passengers
with only very limited luggage accommodation.
So
far as goods traffic is concerned it is probable that provided the
road were in good condition that a Southern Railway engine could
be found to work a trip from Chichester to Selsey though additional
staff expenditure would be incurred.
Rates
and Charges.
in
which the Court of the Railway Rates Tribunal state that they
are satisfied that the West Sussex Railway is a Railway Company
other than an amalgamated company, a Light Railway Company or a
Company whose powers of charging have since 14th August 1919 been
increased by special Act and have applied the schedule of standard
charges of the Southern Railway company to the West Sussex Railway.
It appears that the Tribunal have applied a scale of charges to
a Railway Company which has but little more than a fictitious existence.
So
far as freight traffic is concerned, the standard charges are observed
but passenger fares are in many cases on a very low scale, as is
shewn below in a table giving the Chichester figures :-
| |
|
Single
fares
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
m. |
c. |
|
|
| |
Chichester |
to
Hunston |
2 |
6 |
... |
3d |
| |
" |
"
Chalder |
3 |
50 |
... |
6d |
| |
" |
"
Sidlesham |
4 |
75 |
... |
8d |
| |
" |
"
Selsey |
7 |
27 |
... |
8d |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of
course, the standard scale for the journey from Chichester to Selsey
would give 11½d single, and even on through fares the West
Sussex Company only get 8d single and 11d on third class summer
tickets. The cheap day return ticket between the terminal points
is 1/-, whereas on the Southern Railway possibly 1/3d would be charges.
Traffic
and Revenue.
In
the table set out below will be found particulars of the receipts
from the various sources showing local separate from through traffic
:-
|
1933
|
| Description |
Local
|
Through
|
Total
|
| |
£
|
s
|
d
|
£
|
s
|
d
|
£
|
s
|
d
|
| Passengers |
381.
|
2.
|
3.
|
46.
|
7.
|
8.
|
427.
|
9.
|
11.
|
| Season
tickets |
6.
|
17
|
10.
|
|
-
|
|
6.
|
17.
|
10.
|
| Goods |
78.
|
11.
|
4.
|
638.
|
1.
|
3.
|
716.
|
12.
|
7
|
| Minerals |
|
-
|
|
166.
|
17.
|
9.
|
166.
|
17.
|
9.
|
| Coal
and Coke |
|
-
|
|
692.
|
3.
|
6.
|
692.
|
3.
|
6.
|
| Parcels |
16.
|
4.
|
0.
|
241.
|
1.
|
9.
|
257.
|
5.
|
9.
|
| Miscellaneous
traffic |
11.
|
1.
|
9.
|
45.
|
9.
|
9.
|
56.
|
11.
|
6.
|
| Live
stock |
|
-
|
|
|
15.
|
2.
|
|
15.
|
2.
|
| Mails
and Parcel Post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.
|
7.
|
9.
|
| Miscellaneous
Receipts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
17.
|
1.
|
| |
|
| |
493.
|
17.
|
2.
|
1830.
|
16.
|
10.
|
2369.
|
18.
|
10.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
revenue from merchandise, minerals and parcels has been fairly well
maintained, the receipts for 1931 being £2,019; 1932 . £1,818; 1933
. £1,931. The revenue from these sources in 1920 was £2,316. The
passenger traffic, however, has fallen off considerably and pots
of interest in respect of the different classes of revenue are dealt
with hereunder.
(a)
Goods, etc.
|
The
total tonnage conveyed over the line in 1933 is made up as
follows :-
|
|
| |
Goods |
4,464
tons
|
|
| |
Minerals
|
2,260
tons
|
|
| |
Coal
and coke |
5,224
tons
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Of
these tonnages the following originated on the Selsey Line
:-
|
|
| |
Goods |
704 tons
|
|
| |
Minerals |
1,117
tons
|
|
| |
|
|
|
As
is shewn in certain particulars set out later in the report, there
are a number of traders served from the property of the tramway
at Chichester and the Company receives a good proportion of its
goods revenue from such traffic, earning in respect thereof the
standard R.C.H. terminals. This traffic, except for passing the
exchange points and being shunted into position by the tram engine,
does not in fact go down the Selsey Line at all. The tonnage of
traffic dealt with at Chichester tram station in 1933 was 3,417,
the receipts amounting to £399. With the exception of the very small
amount of goods traffic local to the Selsey Line, the receipts for
which were £78 in 1933, the whole of this sum may be taken as traffic
for the various traders served by the West Sussex at Chichester.
Apart
from Chichester the most important station for freight traffic is
Selsey, though there is some coal traffic to Chalder and a small
tonnage of general goods to Sidlesham. The traffic to the Selsey
Gas Works amounts to more than 1500 tons per year and has to be
carted from the station. Over 1,000 tons of beet sugar was carried
by the tramway last year; this tonnage comprising largely the figures
shewn for minerals in the statement above and this, for the most
part, was loaded at Ferry Station.
Cartage
is performed at Selsey by an agent ( Mr Wingham ). The arrangement
is covered by an agreement which also stipulates that Mr Wingham
shall provide suitable conveyances for passengers and meet every
tram at the station. The expenses in connection with this cartage
which are debited against revenue, amounted to £156 in 1933.
(c)
Passengers.
The
statement below shows the number of passengers conveyed and the
passenger revenue for every year since 1919.
| |
|
No.
of passengers |
|
Receipts |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
£
|
s
|
d
|
| |
1919
...
|
102,292
|
|
3,912.
|
< | |